Still on the SEVA trip to Champagne……. Back at the hotel this evening we were treated to a Champagne tasting hosted by Steve Charters MW who works as an academic in Reims, which is pretty cool given that he’s English. As well as being an MW he is an expert in marketing and consumer behaviour.

Steve Charters MW

The tasting contained some good Champagnes and some interesting ones. We opened with a zero dosage, 100% pinot meunier, which was characteristic and quite fruity, and very good but not my favourite. Better, to me, was the Paque et Fils which was slightly oaked: the oak being very well integrated to give a fine round body but with great complexity of taste and a long finish.

We had a good conversation about the merits of lees ageing v bottle (cork) ageing. A common view is that it’s the lees ageing which matters for Champagne, with this giving it the rich toasty autolytic flavours and rich integration. Consistently, though, for the past few days we’re been shown wines with significant periods of cork ageing and it’s certainly made me wonder whether a good length of time both pre and post disgorging is important for a fine sparkling wine.

We challenged Steve for his views on English sparkling wine. He put forward some passionate views convincingly, urging English growers to pull together with one voice and to rally round a quality charter. The room was in broad agreement with his comments, only broken when we pushed him as to what name English sparkling wine might succeed with. Steve pulled the straightest face he could before announcing that he’d be asking for royalties when we were all using his inspired idea. “Spurgle,” he announced. There was universal loud laughter, including Steve himself. The point, of course, is that it’s a tricky subject.

This entry was posted in Champagne. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Spurgle

  1. Emma Bridge says:

    Was anything said about the length of bottle ageing vs time on lees? I’ve heard somewhere that longer on lees = less bottle life, but never a decent explanation as to why.

    • KenzieWine says:

      No, during the whole time I was in the region there were mutterings about lees v cork (bottle) ageing, but it was just speculation really and I heard no authoritative comments (least of all my own!) IT would be good to know more on this comments. I did speak with an English winemaker last night who told me that at a big English producer he used to work at they kept their “competition” wines separate to ages longer on the bottle so they showed better, instead of selling the rest just after a number of month of bottle ageing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s